All roads seem to be leading
to real estate. Majority if not all investors are willing to sell their other
financial assets to own a piece of realty. Realty as it appears to be the holy
grail of all investments where one simply cannot go wrong.
But investors particularly the
sellers---need to be careful of the taxation aspect on the profit booked. In
other words, if a property is sold at profit, then capital gains tax liability
arises in the hands of the seller.
The quantum of tax liability
depends on the period the property was held prior to being sold.
The gains will be short term
if the property was sold before completion of 3 years from the date of its
acquisition and such gains will be taxed at the tax slab applicable to the
assesse. If however the property has been held for more than 3 years from the
date of its acquisition, then such gains—known as LONG Term capital gains—will
be taxed at flat rate of 20%. However, the investor gets the benefit of
indexation as set out in the Income tax act.
Income tax act also exempts
such gains from being taxed provided some conditions are fulfilled. They are
- The investor has either one year before or two years after the date of transfer purchased another house property
- Or has within three years after the date of transfer constructed another residential house property.
- The investor does not own more than 1 residential house property apart from the one he is presently living in.
- Does not purchase another residential house within 1 year or constructs another residential house within 3 years from the date of sale-- other than the new house.
- The new residential house property so acquired or constructed should not be sold within 3 years from the date of its acquisition.
A question now arises as to
what can be taken as date of acquisition!
There can be different views
on this. For example:
- Date of acquisition can be the date on which the advance is given by the intended buyer.
- It can also be the date when the allotment letter has been issued to the intended buyer.
- The date when the sale deed has been registered.
In absence of clear directives
in the Income tax act, tax authorities rely on various judgments pronounced by
courts of law.
For example to qualify the
investments in case of an apartment, date of acquisition is the date of
allotment of the residential flat. The payment of instalment is only a follow
up action. The mere fact that allotment has been made entitles the investor to
the benefits laid out under the act---even though all the installments have not
been paid by the investor. Thus the date of issue of allotment letter gives the
right to the investor to obtain the conveyance on such flat---enough to be
called an asset within the purview of the Income Tax Act.
Now another question arises:-
Does the investor loses the
benefit of exemption of capital gains u/s 54/54F if the builder fails to
complete the construction within 3 years?
A plain reading of the act and
strict interpretation of the provisions of the act would seem to suggest that
the investor stands to lose the benefit of exemption should the construction
not be completed within the mandated 3 years!
Many judicial pronouncements
in different cases have provided relief in cases where it had been established
that a major part of the sales consideration has indeed been spent on
construction. The logic of
such relaxation is that courts have viewed suctions 54/54F as relief provisions
and as such should be viewed as such.
Different principles laid down
by courts for interpretations of date of acquisition
- The tax payer cannot be denied the benefits of the exemption merely because the builder has failed to hand over the possession of the flat.
- Failure to execute the sale deed or a procedural delay in obtaining the registration will not prevent the buyer/investor from claiming the exemption.
- CBDT has also clarified that to avail the benefit of section 54F the crucial date is the date of allotment of the flat by the seller/promoter, and payment of instalment was only a follow up action while taking possession of the flat only a formality.
In case of a legal dispute,
the court needs to be satisfied that the sale proceed was used for investment
in the new house property.
(Courtesy: - Business Standard)
No comments:
Post a Comment